New Article on Glacier Runoff and Mountain Societies

Members of the Glacier Lab, along with several other colleagues, have published a new global analysis of the societal dimensions of glacier runoff.  Published as part of a 2017 special issue of the Annals of the American Association of Geographers (vol. 107, no. 2), the article provides one of the first global and comparative assessments of water dynamics in glacier-fed watersheds.  There is a large gap in research to date because so few social science and humanities (or human-focused studies) have been conducted.  Our team found that, within the limited research that does exist, studies focus primarily in four areas: social impacts, hydropower, agriculture and food security, and cultural effects.

Importantly, we found that several “next steps” could enhance existing literature.  In particular, future research could more clearly and explicitly attribute changing water use practices to glacier runoff variation. In essence, it is not enough to say simply that glaciers are shrinking and thus water conflicts will arise because water allocation and usage depends on a host of variables — from power and politics to economics, water rights laws, crop preferences and markets, cultural values, available infrastructure and technologies, social inequalities, and environmental forces.  Glacier change is thus but only one factor affecting water distribution, and not everyone will be affected equally from glacier runoff variability.  The literature to date, however, focuses almost exclusively on the role of climate change and glacier loss when making bold, sometimes exaggerated, claims about the effects of glacier retreat on downstream societies.  In the end, one goal of the paper is to help “redefine and reorient the glacier-water problem around human societies rather than simply around ice and climate.”

The author team consists of Glacier Lab members Mark Carey, Olivia Molden, and M Jackson, as well as anthropologist Mattias Rasmussen (University of Copenhagen), hydrologist/glaciologist Anne Nolin (Oregon State University), and climatologist/geoscientist Bryan Mark (Ohio State University).

Alaska Field Report

By Andrea Willingham

One of my favorite things about being a part of the Glacier Lab is getting to contribute to the wildly diverse research conducted among its members.  This summer, I put my own research into practice and ventured to southeast Alaska to execute my field work for my Master’s project on Local and Traditional Ecological Knowledge (LEK/TEK) and science related to climate change. It was my first time conducting social science field work, and inevitably turned out to be an incredible learning experience in every way.  Continue reading

New Glacier Lab Research Assistants Hired for Summer 2016

Several Clark Honors College undergraduate students have been hired as research assistants in the Glacier Lab for summer 2016.  They are working on various glacier-related projects, including:

    • Indigenous peoples and climate change in the Andes; glacier protection and conservation in South America (Josie Kinney)
    • Glacier hazards; ice cores and humanities; virtual water in glacier-fed watersheds (Rebecca Marshall)
    • Climate and health (Candace Joyner)
    • Web design and research dissemination for the Glaciers and Society website (Chris Ableidinger)
    • Glaciers, national parks, and conservation (Doug Sam)
IMG_1748

Undergraduate research assistants in the field, Cordillera Blanca, Peru

Glacier Lab member Hayley Brazier is also conducting research on icebergs and marine environmental history

The Trouble with Climate Change and National Parks

Mark Carey has published a chapter in the new book, National Parks beyond the Nation: Global Perspectives on “America’s Best Idea”, edited by Adrian Howkins, Jared Orsi, and Mark Fiege (Oklahoma, 2016). Carey’s chapter compares climate change rhetoric, discours

National-Parks-Beyond-the-Nation-cover

e, and perspectives in Glacier National Park (USA) and Huascaran National Park (Peru). He argues that the climate discourse exposes and builds on longstanding perceptions of national parks, which are different in both regions. The chapter brings a critical perspective to other studies that focus primarily on documenting climate change impacts in parks. Instead Carey asks why people want to be saving those parks in the first place, how the efforts diverge or perpetuate trends from the past, and what exactly they are trying to save (or not).

Overall, the edited collection featuring the work of prominent scholars working around the world is an excellent contribution to scholarship on national parks globally.

 

Feminist glaciology study published

Glacier Lab members Mark Carey, M Jackson, Alessandro Antonello, and former Lab member Jaclyn Rushing recently published a study on “Glaciers, Gender, and Science” in the peer-reviewed journal Progress in Human Geography. The journal Science recently profiled this article in an interview with Carey.

The concept of “feminist glaciology” is new to many people. It addresses the fact that, while women are more likely to be harmed or negatively affected by glacial melt than men, women’s voices are also less often heard in the context of glacier knowledge.  Furthermore, the study shows that glaciology has been imbued historically (and up to the present) not only with many more men than women, but also with masculinist cultures of exploration, geopolitics, and domination.  Credibility when it comes to glacier knowledge today is often still based on these masculinist undertones.

The article provides an overview of these issues, calling for a new approach to global environmental change research– a framework that considers gender dynamics in environmental (climate, glaciology, hydrology) knowledge as well as one that integrates the social sciences and humanities with natural sciences. The production of a more comprehensive knowledge base is critical to addressing changing environmental conditions worldwide, with the goal of more just and equitable adaptation to global change.